I have yet to meet anyone using insider builds, let alone an expensive Windows Server license for an insider build. Free licensing for insiders would be a boon for Microsoft, provided the licensee can pass some basic requirements (testing, not in prod, etc). But it’s been some years since Microsoft ditched the whole Technet license thing and I don’t think we’ll ever see holistic QA from Microsoft, not when their testers all probably write malware after discovering flaws in early releases. 🤣
I’m catching up on my backlog of interesting links.
https://xkcd.com/2876/
Why Not Use All Three Browsers At Once?
Because I’m a masochist I’m literally using FIrefox, Chrome, and Edge (also Chrome) for various tasks. I have intentionally left ad filtering off for both Chrome and Edge and oh boy is this gonna be fun!
Microsoft® is modifying your keyboard. Can you guess what they’re doing?
Microsoft® is adding a key for Copilot®. I think I’m going to stick with what I have and maybe just continue using Linux?The Windows® key was okay I guess, but adding a new “Copilot® key” just tells me they’re going to force Copilot® on everyone.
I can understand where 23andMe’s lawyers are coming from. Their bias is to their client (or employer). I’m not saying that the company’s response to the class action lawsuit against them is right. In fact I think it’s utterly typical “corporate personhood” BS. At least they said something this time and didn’t just “stay silent” against the naysayers.
I also feel that the thing highlighted below in bold proves how far we in the cybersecurity sector have yet to go.
“Everyone should know better than to use an unhygienic credential,” says Steve Moore, vice president and chief security strategist at Exabeam. “But at the same time, the organization that provides the service ought to have capabilities to limit the risk of that.”
Everyone SHOULD know better. Everyone should know that the best time to deal with a security breach of your account is before it even happens. Not just “assume breach” but actually prevent the breach in the first place by using multifactor, considering hardware tokens, biometrics, passkeys, etc. Just keeping your stuff up to date is only part of the picture, you MUST remain vigilant. Not a paranoid type of vigilant that Hollywood and the news media, and even some cybersecurity companies LOVE to take advantage of (just look at the whole “juice jacking” hype). Just basic things like not re-using passwords, and using long passphrases (with spaces) goes a long way.
And we should be doing this every day when we have conversations with people. We should be educating people and also following our own best practices to boot.
I do have some concern that people could be using ChatGPT for life advice though. It shouldn’t just be concern that people might be out of a job that drives this research. The amount of harm that could already be happening even with guardrails in place is something that should give everyone pause.
Awesome AD Alert!
DO NOT STICK THINGS INTO ELECTRICAL OUTLETS!
ONE SIMPLE TRICK FOR STAYING ALIVE: DO NOT STICK THINGS INTO ELECTRICAL OUTLETS!
I REPEAT! DO NOT STICK THINGS INTO ELECTRICAL OUTLETS!
Is this a war game or an erotic dating sim?
I think its a little from column A, and a little from column B.
I signed up for a free Usenet service a while back with the intention of accessing it with Mozilla Thunderbird and see if newsgroups were still useful as a communications medium. After an hour of viewing what has become of Usenet, at least the alt newsgroups, I can very much understand why Google Groups made this decision (strangely enough I thought they stopped supporting Usenet a long time ago but I digress).
Usenet has many of the same problems that email does, with the added bonus of being even more distributed in a “one to many” way of message flow, by design if you think of it as a forum (it is). Usenet’s cracks are too big to patch and smell of rotten spam. There’s better ways to have discussions on the internet now anyway and I just don’t think there’s reason to go back unless everyone wants to content with an overhauled system when they might as well use something like the Fediverse (Mastodon, Firefish, etc).
Usenet was a springboard in the early Internet, but like Gopher, FTP, etc, we’ve evolved passed it.
AI is capable of running entire companies call center scams now.
Now if only they could only just learn how to properly “human” their necks, ear-rings, glasses, shirt collars, clothing dimensions, etc, that’d be great.
The source of the image above is here, and yes this is a fax/call center scam site: https://webenvy.io/?page_id=2808
I see a possible future where our interaction with data on the internet is through language models exclusively. You will have no choice because your browser will require it and all the open source browsers with poor market share will also not work very well with the new web standards. “WebAI” (let’s just call it that) is on the horizon and right now its looking outright dystopian.
Mozilla pivoting to AI and possibly ditching Firefox? Firefox already has usable forks but what does that really mean for the future whenever everyone is using Chrome (Google) and Edge (Microsoft), content and ad delivery systems with baked in tracking and AI disguised as web browsers?
I think the answer is be aware of this and keep pushing for open source that isn’t tied to a major corporate name.
